The truth about Optimizely’s impact on A/B testing performance (And how edge delivery changes everything)

Website performance can make or break your experimentation program. Did you know that a 1-second delay in page load time can decrease conversion rates by 7%?

As your testing program grows more sophisticated, so do the performance challenges. The success of your experimentation strategy hinges on balancing effective testing with optimal site performance.

But how can you run rigorous A/B tests without slowing down your site and frustrating users?

This is where choosing the right experimentation tool becomes critical. In this article, you'll learn how Optimizely's suite of solutions including Web Experimentation, Edge Delivery, and Feature Experimentation balance testing capabilities with performance requirements, and how to select the right approach for your specific needs.

Key performance metrics that make your visitors leave or stay

Before diving into solutions, let's establish what matters when measuring website performance during experimentation:

1. Page load time: How quickly users can access and interact with your page.
2. Time to First Byte (TTFB): Server response speed is critical for both UX and SEO rankings.
3. Google core web vitals: Google's key metrics including Largest Contentful Paint (LCP), First Input Delay (FID), and Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) affect search ranking and user experience.
4. Flicker: The jarring visual effect when original content loads before being replaced by test variations.
5. Conversion rate impact: How performance issues directly affect your bottom-line metrics.
6. Page speed score: A holistic measure of loading performance across devices and connections.
7. Bounce rate: The percentage of users who leave immediately. It is often directly correlated with slow-loading pages.
8. User experience (UX): How performance affects overall satisfaction, including responsiveness and interactive elements.

Also, it's worth highlighting that both Edge Delivery and Feature Experimentation provide significant SEO benefits that traditional client-side testing cannot match:

• Improved crawl efficiency: Search engines can process your pages faster when not slowed by client-side experimentation code.
• Better core web vitals scores: Google explicitly rewards sites with faster load times and stable layouts in search rankings.
• Reduced TTFB: Edge Delivery dramatically improves Time to First Byte, a critical factor in how search engines evaluate site performance.
• Mobile-first indexing boost: Performance-optimized testing approaches deliver faster experiences on mobile devices, aligning perfectly with Google's mobile-first indexing priorities.

Each experimentation approach handles these differently. Let's explore your options.

Client-side testing with Optimizely Web Experimentation: Speed vs flexibility

Optimizely Web Experimentation operates primarily client-side, making it accessible for marketers and product teams who need visual editing capabilities.

What it delivers:

• Visual editor for creating experiments without developer resources
• Quick implementation for lightweight UI changes
• Robust targeting and analytics capabilities

Performance considerations:

• JavaScript adds to page weight and processing time
• Potential flicker as variations load asynchronously
• Mobile performance challenges on slower connections

Best for: Marketing teams running UI changes and content tests who prioritize ease of use and have moderate performance requirements.

Faster client-side testing with edge delivery

Latency and flicker killing your conversion rates? Don't let slow page loads sabotage your A/B tests.

Edge Delivery brings the power of experimentation to the edge, applying changes directly to your content delivery network (CDN).

The result? Personalized experiences delivered at lightning speed, with zero flicker—no matter how complex your tests.

PlayPause

0:00

/

0:00

MuteUnmute

0%

Playback speedNormal

0.25x

0.5x

0.75x

Normal

1.25x

1.5x

1.75x

2x

QualityAuto

Auto

CaptionsOff

Transcripts

Transcript

Edge Delivery makes changes happen at the CDN level before content reaches the user. If CDN-level changes aren't possible, changes are forwarded to the page in the current version, maintaining functionality.

The full version preserves the web support capabilities customers value, rather than the "snippetless" version that would remove approximately 90% of functionality. Other key aspects:

• Flicker elimination: Removes flicker completely with no more jarring visual shifts
• Performance improvement: Improves Time to First Byte (TTFB) by leveraging edge computing
• CDN compatibility: Currently works with Cloudflare and Netlify. Akamai support is coming in soon.

Best for: Performance-sensitive pages like homepages and checkouts, high-traffic sites, and teams focused on Core Web Vitals optimization or concerned about flicker.

Server-side testing with Feature Experimentation: Max performance, max control

Feature Experimentation offers both server-side and client-side implementation options, giving you flexibility based on your performance needs.

What it delivers:

• Zero impact on front-end performance (when using server-side implementation)
• No JavaScript overhead or flicker (with server-side approach)
• Complete testing flexibility for front-end and back-end changes
• Better mobile performance and SEO benefits
• Winning variations become part of your source code, enabling simple rollout without the additional step of translating JavaScript manipulations into permanent code

The key advantage here is that Feature Experimentation integrates winning variations directly into your source code, streamlining implementation compared to JavaScript-based solutions that require an additional development step to incorporate successful tests into your codebase.

Considerations:

• Requires developer resources for implementation
• No visual editor for creating variations

Best for: Mobile app A/B testing, developer-led teams, performance-critical applications, and technical experiments like testing different vendors, algorithms, or backend processes.

Choosing the right tool: Match your approach to your performance goals

Many organizations successfully use multiple approaches, matching the tool to each specific testing scenario based on performance requirements, team capabilities, and test complexity.

1. When marketing needs control: If marketing autonomy and visual editing are must-haves, and performance impact is acceptable, Optimizely Web Experimentation is your solution.
2. When performance matters but you need visual tools: Edge Delivery provides the perfect middle-ground, applying changes at the CDN level for flicker-free experiences without sacrificing ease of use.
3. When performance is non-negotiable: Feature Experimentation gives you maximum performance with zero frontend impact—ideal for technical teams and critical systems.

Making the right choice requires you to consider:

Match your tool to your performance goals...

Experimentation and performance optimization aren't opposing forces. They're complementary goals that require the right tools.

Optimizely's multi-solution approach gives you options:

• Web Experimentation for the accessible, best-in-class visual editor, making lightweight changes a breeze.
• Edge Delivery for flicker-free, high-performance client-side testing
• Feature Experimentation for zero-impact server-side experimentation

By selecting the right tool for each job, you deliver exceptional experiences that drive business results while maintaining the performance your users expect.